ALSO, lest there be any undue confusion w/r/t gen Z, "conservative" also means conservative about wasting irreplaceable resources like our motherfucking time and we grew up on YT. anyone with YT can see what cops are up to. this whole thing makes no goddamn sense:
AF screens out criminals, so Air Force has very little crime. (Unlike the Army which has like a rape every week AF has almost none). On top of that AF cops are accountable to base commanders while Army MPs r not TLDR: whose rules? Varries by service
-
-
maybe... anyone but army's then haha. for marines we can limit it to the ones allowed overseas, slightly higher standard there maybe that's a good standard to emulate -- have cops meet the same criteria used for overseas screenings
-
might cause a supply shortage, but ignoring that as a possible bottleneck it's a good goal: those screenings, as you doubtless know, are basically just sanity checking 2 things. probability to cause an international incident, and financial susceptibility to bribery and corruption
-
6 Never admit financial weakness in a negotiation.
-
At root, or near it, this happens because it is incentivized to happen. The largest change needed is in the pay. Everything else technically then falls into place via market forces. Ballpark, 1/4 the # of cops & maybe 3x the pay would be about righthttps://twitter.com/AMK2934/status/1046474271965540352 …
-
A In a privately owned city state with high incomes this is not an issue. The incomes r high enough/crime rate low enough that highly paid police can work, and with high pay you can demand any kind of screening you want. But is places where the citizens are a net drain on revenue
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.