Reactionary ideas about putting women back in the "box" of social control seem naive to me; civilization has always been a woman telling her husband what to do. Monogamy was only the standard because women could not control pregnancy, and the income of alphas was limited. Only
-
-
alteration that makes humans biological monogamous. A third option is to accelerate those genes that are being selected for; the genes for wanting children, (though this is not a full solution). A fourth option is push technologically farther with artificial reproduction, though
Show this thread -
this doesn't end the sexual revolution, but "balances it" by making as many women omegas as men, since men who want children will simply grow them. Point of all this is: the farther we get from tribal conditions the worse the disaster becomes.
Show this thread -
Technological distance from the tribal condition ∝ moral disaster + environmental disaster + social disaster.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.