It doesn't. There's a law of identity relation, which shows that consciousness doesn't have the correct properties to be physics.
-
-
Prove that RAM is belief.
-
Build a general analysis machine, then have it recursively analyze itself. Now you have consciousness.pic.twitter.com/OcSSnf4k60
-
You have a recursive analyzing machine, that isn't conscious. Which part of the math has a mind?
-
all of it.
-
2 + 2 = 4. What is 2 + 2 - mind = x. What is x?
-
This question is not-even-wrong. 2 is a number, which is a category. Categories are an artifact of the brains need to minimize processing power. 2 + 2 is itself a subjective question. Even at the atomic level there is no "one" since the number of leptons is constantly fluctuating
-
...but there is a number of leptons. Number is counting. Which means 0 + 1 + 1. Which means 2 is a thing, which contradicts your earlier statement.
-
The number of leptons in the nucleus is constantly in flux. There is no constant number. Also, if you insult me again the conversation is over.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.