They were going to find the witch-marks eventually.https://babe.net/2018/05/17/justin-murphy-hot-take-abortion-57232 …
-
-
Replying to @Outsideness
Babe: Like if you're saying that the corpse is not alive, it doesn't count as a real person, then I don't really think you can also draw parallels between the act of having sex with a corpse and gay sex. Justin: Yeah, that's a good point, I can see that.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @parallaxoptics @Outsideness
Babe: Alright, I do have to ask you this: would you have sex with a dead body? Justin: Hmm. Well, Katie, I'm a happily married man, so having sex with a dead body is out of the question for me.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @parallaxoptics @Outsideness
First
@jmrphy agrees that a person's corpse is not a person... but then he claims he wouldn't have sex with a corpse because he is married, implying that to do so would count as a form of infidelity. I find these two positions inconsistent.2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
well, having sex not with your lawful companion is infidelity
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If death unpersons a corpse, as JM suggests, might as well be sexing your Hoover.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @parallaxoptics @cyborg_nomade and
If the wife knew sex with a corpse was on the table, I'm sure she would have particularly mentioned not doing that. He's aware of this and retroactively inserts the clause on her behalf.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
This is hilarious
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.