Believe me, I’m well aware that Reid led the rule change that lowered the threshold for confirming non-SCOTUS judges to a majority. But Republicans only have 51 votes, and they have attendance problems.http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/402195-gop-leader-criticizes-republican-senators-for-not-showing-up-to-work …
-
-
Show this thread
-
If Dems denied all time agreements (this only requires one senator to object) & forced Republicans to produce all votes for all of Trump’s judicial nominees, Trump would get fewer judges confirmed. The power is there. Democrats just need the will and the discipline to use it.
Show this thread -
In Senate speak a “time agreement” is an agreement passed by unanimous consent (ie, consent of all 100 Senators) to hold votes at a certain time - usually, times that are convenient for senators. The agreements can also speed up confirmations by skipping procedural hurdles.
Show this thread -
Most of the confirmation votes on Trump judges are being held under time agreements. Sometimes the time agreements schedule the votes no earlier than they would happen if all procedural clocks were run. In those cases the agreements do not speed up the confirmations.
Show this thread -
But even when time agreements don’t speed up the process, they do schedule the votes at convenient times of day, helping ensure Republicans can have all 51 senators present to confirm a given nominee.
Show this thread -
Pulling something like this off would require enormous dedication and discipline. And it’s entirely possible that McConnell would still be able to muster the votes for all of Trump’s judicial nominees.
Show this thread -
I forgot to mention: you’d only need one Democratic senator on the floor at all times to execute this plan. It only takes one senator’s objection to block a time agreement, and Dems don’t have to be present to force Republicans to produce all the confirmation votes.
Show this thread -
So while there’s no guarantee this would work, a) you can’t win a fight you don’t show up for b) there’s little cost to trying and c) it’s likely that forcing Republicans to produce all 51 votes to confirm all Trump judges, often late at nght, would result in fewer Trump judges.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why the Ds didn’t publicly refuse to even be in the same room as a self professed sex assaulter is beyond me
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SenSchumer Are you following this thread?? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Gloves off and fight the GOP.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I agree, but aren’t they running the clock on most of the judges already? Why aren’t Senate Ds slowing approps bills down? That would seem a more effective leverage point both in terms of actually getting something in exchange and occupying the floor.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is exactly why
@MichaelAvenatti's message resonates with a lot of Democrats. https://www.dropbox.com/s/bpdwkmjwpf1r222/Fire%20with%20Fire.pdf?dl=0 … From his#WingDing speech:pic.twitter.com/jaOTy1EZSu
-
His message does really resonates, but most of us know that governing comes after campaigning and I for one have had enough of a celebrity reality show President! I’d take Avenati over any of today’s GOP but is that enough?
-
Real life is not a reality show, even though
@MichaelAvenatti is on TV. I think governing experience is helpful, but winning is required first. Give me a Dem who can beat Trump and then I’m interested in the CV. -
That’s where desperation is setting in for everyone. Trump has proven that your first elected office should not be President. I hope he’s impeached so we can maybe get back to something lime normal.
-
Trump is an existential threat to our republic because he is an obvious Russian asset, with apparent psychological and intellectual deficits, who is likely seriously compromised by his long business relations with Russian mobsters.
-
If he had come to the office from a seat in Congress, it would be no different.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.