U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
I know things are wild right now but this is important: New research by @umbernhard @jhalderm and others at the University of Michigan sheds new light on the security of voting systems used around the country:https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/01/ballot-marking-devices-election-security/ …
I note in this thread that the conclusions aren’t so clear cut. In particular, when voters are reminded to confirm their ballot, as every state with BMDs will be doing, error detection rates are as high as 86%. https://twitter.com/beckerdavidj/status/1214939733991796737?s=21 …https://twitter.com/beckerdavidj/status/1214939733991796737 …
Actually, no. When voters received a verbal reminder, error detection ranged from 6.7-16%. Posting signs, like some states are doing, had no effect. To do better, voters need to follow a sample ballot and compare it to the printout. Voters who did that found 73% of errors.
Interesting. I didn't see any research on device security. The authors purposely altered the machines to generate inaccurate ballots to study voters' ballot review habits. Machine security was not studied at all.
Yeah, because that wasn't the point of the study. It's been proven that machines are insecure.
Digital voting is the biggest risk our oligarchy with democratic characteristics faces in 2020.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
