Alliance for JusticeVerifisert konto

@AFJustice

AFJ leads the fight for equal justice and a federal judiciary that safeguards the rights of all, not just the wealthy and powerful.

Washington, DC
afj.org
Registrerte seg juni 2010
3 554 bilder og videoer Bilder og videoer

Tweets

Du har blokkert @AFJustice

Er du sikker på at du vil vise disse tweetene? Dette vil ikke oppheve blokkeringen av @@AFJustice.

  1. Festet tweet
    28. jul.

    BIG NEWS! We are proud to announce that will be the next president of Alliance for Justice! We are looking forward to him taking us !

    3 svar 12 retweets 61 liker
    Vis denne tråden
    Vis denne tråden
    Angre
  2. for 12 timer siden

    Mark your calendars for Tuesday (9/21) at 6 PM! We're hosting an important conversation about the wave of anti-trans legislation sweeping the nation featuring , , , and AFJ President . RSVP here:

    5 retweets 4 liker
    Angre
  3. for 14 timer siden

    During yesterday's hearings on the FBI's mishandling of Larry Nassar's sexual abuse, pointed out the last time a woman testified on sexual assault, it was Christine Blasey Ford, and questions remain about that "investigation" as well:

    1 svar 3 retweets 4 liker
    Angre
  4. for 16 timer siden

    It's been three years since Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed to the Supreme Court, and yet we're still uncovering disturbing aspects of his record that were lost to the rushed process:

    2 svar 7 retweets 11 liker
    Angre
  5. for 18 timer siden

    Not to mention a majority of the current justices were appointed by presidents who didn't even win a majority of that growing population's votes!

    We MUST expand the Supreme Court. Considering that the U.S. has added 240M people & 13 states since 1869, the addition of at least 4 justices is overdue. Let's stop using a negative term to describe a prudent response to the country's growth & concomitant litigation explosion.
    Vis denne tråden
    1 svar 8 retweets 20 liker
    Angre
  6. 15. sep.

    The Supreme Court's decisions have actually been compromising the religious freedom of many people by undermining the separation of church and state at the heart of that freedom:

    1 svar 5 retweets 7 liker
    Angre
  7. 15. sep.

    If you're participating in Netroots, make sure to check out this great training from our brilliant team!

    There are ways 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations can engage in advocacy without endangering their tax status. will teach us when communication is considered lobbying. This is one of many important trainings offered at . Register:
    1 retweet 3 liker
    Angre
  8. 15. sep.

    The Supreme Court depends on the trust of the American people, and after gutting Roe, voting rights, and so many other rights and protections, it's not surprising they don't have it.

    New low for among voters: negative 37 – 50 percent job approval rating, with 13 percent no opinion. "This is the worst job approval since Quinnipiac University began asking the question in 2004, and a steep drop from July 2020, when registered voters approved 52 – 37 %"
    Vis denne tråden
    2 liker
    Angre
  9. 15. sep.

    Congrats to our friends at on this important new project to challenge false narratives about the state of our courts!

    This is Balls & Strikes, a site for critical, progressive, bullshit-free commentary about courts, judges, and the legal system they uphold. Here’s a note from EIC about who we are, what we’re doing, and how you can be a part of it.
    Vis denne tråden
    2 retweets 9 liker
    Angre
  10. 15. sep.

    "War is peace, freedom is slavery, and the Supreme Court is a dispassionate nonpartisan branch of government free of bias — this is the Orwellian fable that Justice Amy Coney Barrett is now asking Americans to believe." -

    2 liker
    Angre
  11. 15. sep.

    At this point, the Supreme Court is the "Roberts Court" in name only.

    2 liker
    Angre
  12. 15. sep.

    Today is a great day to .

    2 retweets 4 liker
    Angre
  13. 15. sep.

    "The thing that unites Barrett, at the beginning of her career on the Supreme Court, and Breyer, at the end of his, is their awe-inspiring self-validation in the form of trumpeting a judicial neutrality that does not always exist." -

    1 svar 1 retweet 1 liker
    Angre
  14. 15. sep.

    We can expect to hear some questions today about why the FBI did not fully investigate accusations made about Brett Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court confirmation process:

    1 svar 4 retweets 8 liker
    Angre
  15. 14. sep.

    Another judge confirmed, and more coming! Great news.

    Confirmed, 52-44: Executive Calendar #260 Angel Kelley to be U.S. District Judge for the District of Massachusetts.
    2 retweets 13 liker
    Angre
  16. 14. sep.

    There appears to be a double standard on the Senate Judiciary Committee in terms of who is allowed to criticize Supreme Court nominees. Great reporting on today's hearing from :

    Today, one of Biden's nominees to a U.S. appeals court repeatedly declined to say if she still thinks Brett Kavanaugh is "intellectually and morally bankrupt."
    1 svar 1 retweet 1 liker
    Angre
  17. 14. sep.

    Listen to about the significance of Justice Barrett's gaslighting this week:

    Angre
  18. 14. sep.

    "So Barrett should leave the pious remarks about judicial independence to others, or at least deliver them at a time and place where she risks being struck by lightning for hypocritical self-righteousness, which is an abomination to the Lord."

    2 retweets 7 liker
    Angre
  19. 14. sep.

    "...And they should ignore Barrett and others who claim this court’s decisions are nonpartisan — at least until and unless we see evidence to the contrary." -

    3 retweets 4 liker
    Angre
  20. 14. sep.

    If you missed this morning's judicial nominations hearing, at has you covered:

    1 retweet 2 liker
    Angre
  21. 14. sep.

    "So are Barrett and Breyer simply lying to us? I would suggest it is something more insidious: They have convinced themselves that their judicial “philosophy” is neutral, rather than a means to turn the court into an instrument of partisan power."

    1 retweet 3 liker
    Angre

@AFJustice har ikke Tweetet enda.

Lastingen ser ut til å ta sin tid.

Twitter kan være overbelastet, eller det kan ha oppstått et midlertidig problem. Prøv igjen, eller se Twitters status for mer informasjon.

    Du vil kanskje også like

    ·