I saw somewhere that there was musing that this could be a case of multiple discovery, and I have to say I strongly reject that claim. (1/6) https://t.co/Lq4mbBF3aS
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
You’d know more about the conf than I. But there is a big difference between “there’s work out there that ppl really should have been aware of,” and “these people plagiarized/poached,” especially when played out on Twitter. Unless you think Twitter is the first resort...
Keskustelun loppu
-
-
-
"people are unaware of the internet, what is a google" oh wait no, since the volume also cites blogshttps://twitter.com/erik_kaars/status/1212792331860140033?s=20 …
-
Are we talking about the ECR editors? Or two ECR authors, one of whom has addressed this? You think the editors should’ve been more hands on? Cool. You think the authors should have done more/different groundwork? Fine. Accusations of not-actual plagiarism by tweetstorm? Not ok
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
"Ideas from conferences frequently get shared w/o attribution." That's simply wrong. It doesn't matter in which form and outlet an idea was presented. You cite it as long as you can trace it back to the source. Conference programs stay online for years nowadays +
-
so even if you forgot who was the presenter, the title of the presentation, etc., you can always go back and check. If still unsure, you can always drop the person an email to check and ask for the relevant quote if necessary. Conference presentations aren't fair game.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.