2. It may be tempting to shut down speech we disagree with, but...
-
-
-
3. once we allow the government to decide what we can say, see, or hear, or who we can gather with
-
4. history shows us that the most marginalized will be disproportionately censored and punished for unpopular speech.
-
5. We are all free to reject and protest ideas we don't agree with. That is a core, fundamental freedom of the United States.
-
6. If we allow the government to shut down speech for some, we all will pay the price down the line.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
When I was in France trying to talk through the differences in American political culture to French folks, the ACLU just came up a lot.
-
Because they have weaker free speech rules? Or why?
-
Does the US have "weak free speech rules" because they let people have ideas you don't like? By the way "free speech rules" is an oxymoron.
-
I was referring to France. Emma was talking about her discussions while in France. Context is key. Thank you for calling.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So what if they're inciting violence and one of their supporters literally just murdered two dudes
-
If they incite violence, there's a remedy for that under the law, too.
-
Ted's got it taken care of, no worries.
-
The police tend to SUPPORT these racists, so think again about the police helping anyone out.
-
If you think LEOs aren't applying the law as they should, or equally, the DOJ has a civil rights division for that.
-
Lol my man, you are naive as can be.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
So your issue with the Portland police applying law unequally just started February 9th?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The Mayor
@tedwheeler is not seeking to limit the content of speech. He is seeking to prevent violence. - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.