Really? What about the trans student Milo outed and bullied until she left school in Wisconsin?http://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2016/12/16/breitbart-s-milo-yiannopoulos-doubles-down-harassing-transgender-university-wisconsin-student/214849 …
-
-
-
Why does her speech, her right to exist without being put on display not matter? Where were you then?
-
And I'm no lawyer or anything, but where in the constitution does it say someone is entitled to a paid speaking fee at colleges?
-
If Milo wants to go from school to school and yell from the center of the quad, great. What entitles him to an auditorium/thousands $?
-
If the school permits use of facilities, its determination of who can and can't use them can't be viewpoint-based.
-
1.) No, a non-student does not have a right to use facilities. 2.) Nor be paid.
-
Talk to Hillary about getting paid to give a speech….
-
What? What does that have to do with ANYTHING here?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Given the outrage this is getting from people who generally support you, this could use some clarification. Are you representing Milo?
-
we are not.
-
-
Interview w/
@berkitron explains ACLU has longstanding role defending free speech rightshttp://www.npr.org/2017/02/12/514785623/the-aclu-explains-why-theyre-supporting-the-rights-of-milo-yiannopoulos … -
seems pretty pointless to go in for Milo when a) he isnt your client and b) his 1A rights are undisturbed
-
could be said ACLU has an interest in defending free expression for its own sake
-
@berkitron could. if ACLU is so tactically dumb & hurtful as to do so like this, it deserves criticism -
I think it's v important aclu maintains commitment to defending FS regardless of politics
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
which part of free speech or the first amendment requires people to give someone else a platform?
-
if a government funded entity is giving the platform, cant viewpoint discriminate. law is very clear.
-
so if I want NPR to broadcast me farting for 24 hours a day, I can force them? They get about $2-3 million from fed.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
prove it's viewpoint discrimination and not content discrimination.
-
you're asking someone to prove a negative with goalposts you keep moving?
#muhlogicalfallacies -
it's either/or; if it's viewpoint discrimination it's necessarily not content discrimination.
-
so, to be perfectly clear, you believe it's acceptable for mobs to define what qualifies as hate speech?
- 20 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.