I don’t know how a census to get demographics of “citizens” is wrong by asking first if you are indeed a “citizen”. Always fighting for illegals it seems to me!
-
-
-
The purpose of the census isn't to get demographics of citizens, and there's never been a citizen/noncitizen distinction of who it's supposed to count. From the 14th amendment, it wants to get "the whole number of persons in each State"
-
There has been a distinction in the past. Recently taken off by the Obama Administration for the 2010 Census.
-
This is not accurate. 2010 eliminated the long form where the citizenship *question* had been (because as of 2010 citizenship info comes from the ACS). But even before that the census did not made a cit/non-cit distinction in who it wants to *count*.
-
Nice try, but wrong.
對話結束
新對話 -
-
-
I will refuse to answer it, period.
-
*watches a video talking about how important the census is for proper representation and funding and that the administration doesn't want everyone counted*
Democrat 2020: I'm not going to answer it!!!
Looks like the administration's plan is working like gangbusters. -
I will skip that question, and answer the rest.
-
Then it will be invalid and disregarded. Thus the reason ACLU is arguing against it
- 還有 1 個回覆
新對話 -
-
-
Who’s the douchebag in the glasses?
-
Do you mean the attorney who is the Director of the Voting Rights Project?
-
Yes, that douchebag. Thanks
-
Ok, I just laughed out loud. And that Douchebag actually said, “Can you blame IMMIGRANTS from wanting to hide that fact.” THEY WOULDNT HIDE IT IF THEY WERE LEGAL! Thanks!
對話結束
新對話 -
-
-
this is great. we need more concise explanations about important topics so everyone can understand why we all need to participate.
謝謝,Twitter 將使用這項資訊來使你的時間軸更完美。 還原還原
-
-
-
Yea, they won't say "no" because they know they are here illegally. But yea, they can check "Yes"
-
This question does not belong on the Census. This administration already has the answer through Vital Records, DHS, State & Defense Depts. Putting it on the Census is designed to intimidate and discriminate. Nothing else.
-
I worked for Census2010, knocking on doors trying to convince non-respondents to take a few minutes to answer ten questions. Adding a completely unnecessary citizenship question will make that so much more difficult.
-
Then we’ll have an accounting of all the residencies that answered, didn’t answer and provided no answer.
-
You can not "count" answers that don't exist.
對話結束
新對話 -
看來要一段時間讀取資料。
Twitter 可能已超出負載,或發生暫時性的小問題。請再試一次,或造訪 Twitter 狀態以取得更多資訊。