So @ACLU is now against civil liberties? Good to know
-
-
-
The ACLU has always hated the second amendment. It has been persistently ambivalent about privacty since purging Nat Hentoff. It is no longer for free speech.
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Excuse you, but the wide availability of firearms for civilian use and possession is because of an enumerated right, itself grounded in the pre-existing and natural right of self-defense against crime and tyranny. It isn't a mistake, but the sum and substance of the debate.
- Još 9 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This plea might have held more sway from an ACLU who hadn't started expressing misgivings about speech they found objectionable. It may be time for a new civil rights organization to fill the gaps the ACLU is leaving. I'll start sending my donations to
@TheFIREorgHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The right of rape survivors to defend themselves from aggression has never mattered to the ACLU.
-
“end freedom so we can preserve freedom”
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The irony of the ACLU’s statement is that in virtually all of the places where there is an acute misuse of firearms, such as poor urban areas, the ability to legally own firearms has been severely restricted by liberal governments, so only the criminals have guns. Go figure...
-
Restricted by regressive socialist governments. Nothing liberal or progressive about restricting rights. Liberal and liberty are meant to go hand in hand.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
So we have to destroy liberty in order to save it? Pass.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.