Some background on #MasterpieceCakeshop: Dave Mullins and Charlie Craig visited Masterpiece Cakeshop in Colorado in July of 2012. They were planning to order a cake for their upcoming wedding reception, and invited Charlie’s mom along to help them pick it out.
-
-
Show this thread
-
When the shop owner realized the cake was for Dave and Charlie, he refused to sell them a cake because they are LGBT.https://www.aclu.org/cases/masterpiece-cakeshop-v-colorado-civil-rights-commission …
Show this thread -
Colorado law prohibits businesses open to the public, like
#MasterpieceCakeshop, from denying service to anyone based on who they are, including their religion, race, or sexual orientation or gender identity.Show this thread -
Dave and Charlie filed a complaint. The Colorado Civil Rights Commission determined that Masterpiece Cakeshop illegally discriminated against Dave and Charlie. The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed that decision, unanimously.
Show this thread -
Still, Masterpiece Cakeshop brought this case all the way to the Supreme Court, arguing the shop can refuse to serve a same-sex couple. This argument isn't new. And it's lost at the Supreme Court before:https://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights/lgbt-nondiscrimination-protections/masterpiece-cakeshop-case-what-you-need-know?page=2 …
Show this thread -
As a nation, we’ve already rejected the idea that businesses open to the public have a license to discriminate against people because of who they are.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Does this case hinge on the CCRD's involvement? That is, if this were purely private litigants, could the Court have reached the same decision (aka with no state action)?
-
No(imho)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s still a terrifying precedent.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.