Detail oriented,
fact-based, and educated.
This, I Like!
#Science4TruthNGov
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have a bio degree, minored in geo. Graduated w honors, and was mentioned in "Who's Who in American Colleges and Universities". Man made climate change is a tax scam.
-
I have a biochem degree so I don't have the geo background but why do you say it's a scam?
-
Shouldn't we be fighting deforestation to combat climate change? If CO2 is in such abundance, & man made, don't more plants & trees make sense? The ocean produces most of the carbon in the atmo, we cannot control it, right?
-
I've been told by biology classes that microbes actually are responsible for most of the carbon fixation that happens on the planet. I'm not sure if that's correct or not but that's what I learned in school. I've been wrong before
-
That's 100% true & accurate. The thing is they are mostly in the ocean & the gas releases from the surface when the microbes die off/decompose. Think of how a pond "turns" in the summer. All the organic material dies of, floats to surface & decomposes, & the cycle begins again.
-
The amount of carbon humans are putting into the atmosphere is insignificant when compared to this. I think I read over 90% come from ocean material. I could be off on that number.
-
For a thought project: Think of if the ocean had a large microbial & organic material die off one year, this would impact carbon levels in a HUGE way, & since we have less than 150 years of atmospheric data, this could be attributed to humans rather than what actually may occur.
-
We have been on a warming trend for hundreds of years now. And we know full well humans didn't "accelerate" the change in climate in the past. To those who say "it's settled science", it is not. It's a projected theory based on hypothesis based on less than 150 years of data.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Science is hard. Government should be easy for them. A waste of their talents, really.
-
They will pave the way for future scientists by removing government interference from science.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good! More people with common sense and more than basic knowledge of science!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
#BlueWave2018 and#RedWave2018 ... Meet the#ParticleWave2018 They serve a "dual" purpose..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just being a scientist doesn't mean someone is qualified to be an elected official..
-
Lol, I agree but look at the track record of actors and reality TV stars in politics. Surely scientists can't be any worse.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
M-morty *burp* we. We. We. We’re *burp* running for office Morty.
-
Geez Rick, i-i-i don't think this is a good idea. I-i-i mean look at all the alternate universes we already destroyed. THINK ABOUT THEIR FAMILIES RIIIIICK.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.