I thought the dems were against those that “buy” elections with their own money? Huh
-
-
-
Dems are against him. He is wasting his money.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No vote from me
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's okay but why do we need more of old & rich? We already have old & rich, and in the end the rest of us got hosed. The TRUST FACTOR has made many Paranoid. I'm sure he means well, but let's move away from New York for a change. Most of our presidents came from smaller cities.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don’t forget Wisconsin!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GOP He should not be anywhere next to that white house, he was unable to relate to ordinary crime victims like me while he was mayor. The NYPD would even acknowledge my report after my apartment was burglarized and wrote a letter to the mayor explaining who the thieves wasThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Waste of money
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not one swing state among the ad buys? What a waste of $24 million! Give that money to the poor instead of feeding your ego Bloomberg.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bloomberg wouldn't even win his own state.pic.twitter.com/6OaDYkMu5d
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do we need more ads? No. Could that $ do a lot more good 4 the campaigns of other very qualified candidates? Yes. Could it make a huge difference in education, housing & feeding the poor? Yes. Helping those who are being beggared by illness? Yes. He could use a $.02 wealth tax!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.