An openly white nationalist as president; tragic story
-
-
-
If I have it right, Melania was not a citizen when their kids were born. So they should revoke their kids’ citizenship first, to show that they genuinely believe in their own policies.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What about his OWN FAMILY
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It's not a "policy," it's enshrined in the Constitution. When your headline just quotes every moronic thing he says it makes it sound like this is up for debate. It isn't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He is right. It is a crazy policy that many countries have.
-
Almost no first world countries outside the US and Canada have birthright citizenship.
-
Almost?
-
As far as I know there are none, unless you want to call Brazil or Pakistan first world countries.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He NEVER read the Constitution, did he?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
How about this
pic.twitter.com/ic1MNEVwjaThis media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A vast majority of nations such as Australia or Japan do not have such a policy. These days too many people are taking advantage of this policy Negatively affects our social programs that U.S. tax payers are stuck paying for.https://twitter.com/MarkSKrikorian/status/1058130132475502592?s=20 …
-
This is not just the question of policy. This is a consintinutonal issue. US is founded on it. If any president can do away with 14th A, then what stops any president doing away with 2nd A or 1st A? Get real.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The 14th of our constitution was appropriate for the time. Slaves who were brought to the US against their will. Granted their children right to citizenship, that time has passed-doesn’t mean we should now give citizenship to those that come here and have kids.
@realDonaldTrump -
Does this apply to 2nd A, too? In the age of automatics machine guns that can fire how many bullets per minute & in the age of drones?
-
Machine guns are banned and yet there is still a 2nd amendment
-
Machine Guns are not banned - they are controlled under Title II of the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968 - which revised the National Firearms Act of 1934. Read a little you might learn something. Bang Bang
-
You cannot buy a machine gun. Only law and military has access to them. And guess what ? There’s still a second amendment my point is you can ban weapons of war and still have a second amendment
-
You are 100% wrong - if you are not a felon and a US citizen you can buy a machine gun if you pass a background check and buy it from a Federal Firearms Dealer that deals in NFA Firearms. Look up NFA firearms to understand more...
#pewpewlife
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.