Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ABC's profile
ABC News
ABC News
ABC News
Verified account
@ABC

Tweets

ABC NewsVerified account

@ABC

All the news and information you need to see, curated by the @ABC News team. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abcnews 

New York City / Worldwide
abcnews.com
Joined April 2009

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    ABC News‏Verified account @ABC Oct 4

    Sen. Dianne Feinstein on FBI report about sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh:"The most notable part of this report is what's not in it." "The FBI did not interview Brett Kavanaugh, nor did the FBI interview Dr. Blasey Ford." http://abcn.ws/2O1B5xQ pic.twitter.com/rXhbsJ5WOf

    Video
    See the whole picture with @ABC News.
    8:18 AM - 4 Oct 2018
    • 743 Retweets
    • 1,674 Likes
    • Reyna alvarado thuctram EG Arnold DJ FROSTY Shirley Hogan BW Travel Corner Moj lotus blossom Aladura Patriarch
    422 replies 743 retweets 1,674 likes
      1. New conversation
      2. ABC News‏Verified account @ABC Oct 4

        MORE: Sen. Dianne Feinstein: "In my view, from what I saw, the investigation was very limited." http://abcn.ws/2O1B5xQ pic.twitter.com/NkFWHPQP7g

        45 replies 74 retweets 177 likes
        Show this thread
      3. ABC News‏Verified account @ABC Oct 4

        Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on FBI report into sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh: "I disagree with Senator Grassley's statement that there was 'no hint of misconduct.'" http://abcn.ws/2O1B5xQ pic.twitter.com/AMBIhAiR8z

        47 replies 178 retweets 334 likes
        Show this thread
      4. ABC News‏Verified account @ABC Oct 4

        Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer: "We are reiterating our call to make the directive that the White House and Counsel McGahn sent to the FBI public because we believe it greatly constrained the investigation from the get-go." http://abcn.ws/2O1B5xQ pic.twitter.com/AGHNsKoCdb

        102 replies 187 retweets 366 likes
        Show this thread
      5. ABC News‏Verified account @ABC Oct 4

        Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Kavanaugh: "For goodness sake, this is the United States of America! Nobody is supposed to be guilty until proven innocent in this country." "The Senate should not set a fundamentally un-American precedent here." http://abcn.ws/2O1B5xQ pic.twitter.com/GnIsQN23fv

        93 replies 64 retweets 159 likes
        Show this thread
      6. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Amy Swearer‏ @AmySwearer Oct 4
        Replying to @ABC

        They both gave full statements under oath and were questioned by the Committee. They can supplement their statements at any time without the FBI. If the ranking member had questions for either, perhaps she should have asked them at the hearing...either of them.

        8 replies 9 retweets 99 likes
      3. Gregarious Rex‏ @Gvolz89 Oct 4
        Replying to @AmySwearer @ABC

        Swetnik was never interviewed either. Neither were about 40 witnesses. This whole thing was a sham, not a real investigation.

        2 replies 2 retweets 12 likes
      4. Amy Swearer‏ @AmySwearer Oct 4
        Replying to @Gvolz89 @ABC

        Any single one of those "potential" witnesses can give their statements to the Committee at literally any time. They can do it right now. This very second. They could have done it two weeks ago, too. Or any time in between.

        1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes
      5. Amy Swearer‏ @AmySwearer Oct 4
        Replying to @AmySwearer @Gvolz89 @ABC

        The FBI does not draw conclusions. It gathers information and gives it to the Senate so that it can advise and consent (i.e., draw conclusions). If anyone has relevant information, it is their civic duty to share it regardless of whether the FBI asks for their statement.

        1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes
      6. Gregarious Rex‏ @Gvolz89 Oct 4
        Replying to @AmySwearer @ABC

        Then the FBI should have accepted the information that people were reaching out to supply them with. Instead they turned them away because the white house deliberately restricted them. There's no reason to rush this confirmation process.

        1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes
      7. Amy Swearer‏ @AmySwearer Oct 4
        Replying to @Gvolz89 @ABC

        They. Can. Literally. Send. Them. To. The. Committee. Right. Now. There are no restrictions on sending it there. The FBI had narrow parameters (and for good reason, because it's a giant ploy to waste time). The Committee is who needs them - and who the FBI would give it to.

        3 replies 0 retweets 12 likes
      8. Aaron Astor‏ @AstorAaron Oct 4
        Replying to @AmySwearer @Gvolz89 @ABC

        That's not how it works. They HAVE sent information. But the Committee hasn't officially decided to consider it. The FBI could have contacted any of the Ramirez witnesses within a few hours without delay.

        2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
      9. Amy Swearer‏ @AmySwearer Oct 4
        Replying to @AstorAaron @Gvolz89 @ABC

        If there is a statement submitted, it will be considered. It has already happened with regard to many other submissions in the last few weeks. The FBI's involvement isn't necessary, and doesn't even itself guarantee consideration (as evidenced by its immediate dismissal by Dems).

        2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
      10. 1 more reply
      1. New conversation
      2. mass4‏ @trumpettur4 Oct 4
        Replying to @ABC

        There would have been plenty of time to investigate the "allegations"in private if Feinstein would have started when she first received the letter month's ago...instead the Dems leaked it to the feckless media to take down a good man They're plan backfired #DEMSWILLPAY

        1 reply 8 retweets 12 likes
      3. LongIslander‏ @WanderBrn2 Oct 4
        Replying to @trumpettur4 @Colonel_Infidel @ABC

        They wanted to GRAND STAND and they did, so now it is time for them to SHUT THE HELL UP.

        0 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
      4. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. Suzanne Simonelli‏ @BECrusader86 Oct 4
        Replying to @ABC

        Why did the FBI need to interview Ford & Kavanaugh? You and your Senate committee did that.

        4 replies 0 retweets 17 likes
      3. John Wesley Shipp‏Verified account @JohnWesleyShipp Oct 4
        Replying to @BECrusader86 @ABC

        You must know that an FBI investigation would differ greatly fr the GOP clowncar that seized the mic from their own rape prosecutor (ie “female assistant”) & set their hair on fire at the beginning of Kavanaugh’s testimony the moment she began getting close to sensitive questions

        1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
      4. postwarO27‏ @postwarO27 Oct 4
        Replying to @JohnWesleyShipp @BECrusader86 @ABC

        Time to confirm Kavanaugh.

        0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
      5. End of conversation
      1. Fearing Sword‏ @GladNebula Oct 4
        Replying to @ABC

        What’s not in it is evidence! Never has been, never will be, never was. #SilentMajority always votes but rarely exposes their political views. No need to open oneself up to harassment by liberal and #socialist hacks.

        0 replies 1 retweet 16 likes
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Eric Brown‏ @browne782002 Oct 4
        Replying to @ABC

        So basically she doesn't like the results so she is trying to make it out to be an invalid investigation

        3 replies 0 retweets 26 likes
      3. Vote CYAN or TURQUOISE‏ @D4thewin Oct 4
        Replying to @browne782002 @ABC

        No basically you havent been following the story because if you had you would know that the FBI was restrained by the WH from talking to most everyone who volunteered to come forward BEFORE the report

        4 replies 2 retweets 5 likes
      4. Pete Mitchell‏ @CrangesMcB13 Oct 4
        Replying to @D4thewin @browne782002 @ABC

        Baaa goes the sheep. This is just another “it didn’t go our way, so we’re whine”. Dems are a lost cause.

        2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      5. Aaron Astor‏ @AstorAaron Oct 4
        Replying to @CrangesMcB13 @D4thewin and

        No, that was Benghazi.

        1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      6. Pete Mitchell‏ @CrangesMcB13 Oct 4
        Replying to @AstorAaron @D4thewin and

        Comparing losing an investigation (and/or election) to the deaths of Americans in Benghazi is scumbag level, which ain’t surprising coming from lefties.

        4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      7. Aaron Astor‏ @AstorAaron Oct 4
        Replying to @CrangesMcB13 @D4thewin and

        No, what is scumbag level is trying to turn a terrorist attack into a partisan conspiracy theory. And then doing it over and over when the first reports show that there was no big conspiracy by the Obama Administration.

        0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      8. End of conversation

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info