Any account that promotes violence, bullying, annihilation of other races or religions, destruction of private property & the like, should be banned. The judge isn't thinking on all cylinders, for he is willing to aid & abet hate groups.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Bout time somebody jerks a knot in tweeters ASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It kind of cuts both ways guys. Be careful what you ask for. Stupid libs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hate speech is not free speech!! Keep him off the cable networks, social media, and youtube!!
-
Hate Speech is Free Speech. It's just private companies can choose to ban users for whatever reason they like. However, recent court ruling ordering Trump to unblock people makes this more questionable. If Twitter has free speech then they must protect hate speech too.
-
Trump had to unblock people because of who he is as a public figure. Get your facts straight.
-
That doesn't apply to a private forum, which is why the DOJ overturned it. It requires greater debate to decide where a service like Twitter falls in regards to our constitutional amendments and more. So no, you get your facts straight.
-
Or I should say why the DOJ is in the process of overturning it, because the discussion is happening NOW. Just wanted to clarify my facts.
-
Oh, sweetie, not overturned yet means the ruling stands. And it's because he uses it to communicate with the public. It has nothing to do with the private company of Twitter. You're adorable though.
-
Don't try to patronize me while lying to make yourself feel better about being uninformed.
-
I'm not the one confusing presidential communications with a private enterprise.
- 16 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, hate speech is free speech, but that doesn't mean 3rd parties have to stand for it or allow it on their platforms.
-
Yeah! And I think trespassing shouldn't be criminalized. There's freedom of movement. Right?
-
Are you saying there shouldn't be consequences? Because that's asinine.
-
You're a real brainless fellow.
-
I see you don't have a rebuttal. Not surprised.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a very courageous Judge. No one wants a "white nationalist movement" to spread their hate. However, this is America, free speech & all that stuff.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.