African American Policy ForumVarmennettu tili

The lawyers representing Sylvia’s claim expressly argued this as an intersectional claim as domestic workers are predominantly Black women, on the basis of race AND gender. The Court AGREED.

This innovative judgments shows the importance of using intersectionality to map the margins of systemic discrimination and as such affirms the importance of being able to teach and practice intersectionality in our social movements.

The judgment noted “adopting intersectionality... reveals how individual experiences vary according to multiple combinations of privilege, power, and vulnerability as structural elements of discrimination.”

The Court noted “the power of an intersectional approach lies in its capacity to shed light on the experiences and vulnerabilities of certain groups that have been erased or rendered invisible”

The global attacks on emancipatory tools like intersectionality and critical race theory, serves to legitimately imperil visionary judgments like that of the SA Constitutional Court

However Sylvia Mahlangu’s stunning court victory, which affirmed the dignity her mother was stripped of in her death, shows the interconnectedness of our fight for domestic workers across the world .

The social, historical and economic conditions that led to Maria Mahlangu’s precarity are no different to the interlocking pressures faced by domestic workers in the US

The path to victory that was made possible by this intersectional consciousness fortifies us in our fight against attempts to ban intersectionality in the US and across the world #truthbetold