Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Breaking: An attorney representing one of the grand jurors in Breonna Taylor's case put out a statement indicating that "The grand jury didn't agree that certain actions were justified, nor did it decide the indictment should be the only charges in the Breonna Taylor case."
This directly contradicts the statement made by Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron. The announcement also confirms that "The grand jury was not presented any charges other than the three Wanton Endangerment charges against Detective Hankison."
Kentucky AG needs a bar complaint for his dishonesty.
Exactly. Those were the only three charges they were presented with (I know an insider). So the GJ never had the chance to indict anything else. It’s sad. I’m glad there will be transparency finally.
How can the people of Kentucky trust Daniel Cameron to fight on their behalf? It’s simple, they can’t.
#JusticeForBreonnaTaylorNOW
Let’s point out the AG was a protege of McConnell.... so why anyone would be surprised is....well, a surprise!pic.twitter.com/QwsKAjNeEY
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
