Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Breaking: An attorney representing one of the grand jurors in Breonna Taylor's case put out a statement indicating that "The grand jury didn't agree that certain actions were justified, nor did it decide the indictment should be the only charges in the Breonna Taylor case."
This directly contradicts the statement made by Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron. The announcement also confirms that "The grand jury was not presented any charges other than the three Wanton Endangerment charges against Detective Hankison."
I hope @kwelkernbc will be discussing this topic on Thursday!
I suggest threading through definitions 1 and 2, here:https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism …
Can they convene a new grand jury? The AG should step down or recuse himself. #JusticeForBreonnaTaylor
#BlackLivesMatter
and it is time law enforcement change their approach at policing. There is no reason Breonna should be dead. The murdered her.pic.twitter.com/nGAV6h7q92
I think this was obvious as soon as the news of a grand juror wanting the information of the trial released came to light. This was never intended to be a fair trial because none of them were ever in trial for the crime they committed.
Can someone help a legal noob like me understand what this means?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
