Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
This should be disqualifying. The Fourteenth Amendment, in addition to providing for due process and equal protection, is what applies the Bill of Rights to the states. It was passed shortly after the Civil War as a necessary corrective for a Constitution that condoned slavery.
To suggest that the Fourteenth Amendment is "possibly illegitimate" is to suggest that all people are not equal under the law. It is a rejection or more than a century and a half of progress towards greater civil rights.
This should raise as many alarm bells as when Amy Coney Barrett suggested that the right to vote and serve on juries can be limited to only virtuous decisions. The full paper can be found here: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1619&context=jcl …
please unroll @threadreaderapp
Saluti, please find the unroll here: @AAPolicyForum: In a 2016 paper, Amy Coney Barrett described the Fourteenth Amendment as "possibly illegitimate." The… https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1310595194799128577.html … See you soon. 
The 1st Amendment arguments for "religious freedom" against the LGBTQ community are teeing up for a run against Brown v. Board. I have no doubts.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
