In her opinion she makes no mention of how such "virtuous citizen" restrictions were used after the Civil War and the passage of the Reconstruction Amendments to deny African Americans the right to vote.
-
-
Show this thread
-
At a time when the right to vote is under extreme attack, we should be critical of those who endorse outdated notions rooted in white supremacy as a justification for denying millions of Americans the right to vote.
Show this thread -
The full opinion (which concerns whether someone convicted of a felony can prohibited from owning a firearm), as well as Judge Barrett's dissent and her tangent regarding the right to vote can be found here: http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2020/images/09/21/rssexec.pdf …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do religious extremists deserve privacy if magick terrorism is real?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nice job cherry picking quotes that serve your agenda.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Nope. The opposite. In her dissenting opinion on a Second Amendment case, she said rights should be separate from government tests of "virtue."
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Was she referring to people who aren't felons? You're not really putting this into context.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.