In her opinion she makes no mention of how such "virtuous citizen" restrictions were used after the Civil War and the passage of the Reconstruction Amendments to deny African Americans the right to vote.
-
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
At a time when the right to vote is under extreme attack, we should be critical of those who endorse outdated notions rooted in white supremacy as a justification for denying millions of Americans the right to vote.
Afficher cette discussion -
The full opinion (which concerns whether someone convicted of a felony can prohibited from owning a firearm), as well as Judge Barrett's dissent and her tangent regarding the right to vote can be found here: http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2020/images/09/21/rssexec.pdf …
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Do religious extremists deserve privacy if magick terrorism is real?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Nice job cherry picking quotes that serve your agenda.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Nope. The opposite. In her dissenting opinion on a Second Amendment case, she said rights should be separate from government tests of "virtue."
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Was she referring to people who aren't felons? You're not really putting this into context.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.