Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Both statements here are untrue. The Electoral College is the product of a meeting of 55 aristocratic white men who met for a few months who met for a summer in Philadelphia. Twenty-five of those men kept other humans in bondage. We do not owe them unlimited deference.https://twitter.com/shadihamid/status/1306230340638388224 …
Of course this doesn't mean we should reject the Constitution wholesale. But we also shouldn't view it as beyond critique and certainly not as the product of any remotely democratic process.
I am reminded of the words of Justice Thurgood Marshall on the bicentennial of the Constitution. "Nor do I find the wisdom, foresight, and sense of justice exhibited by the Framers particularly profound. To the contrary, the government they devised was defective from the start."pic.twitter.com/IkMRjAFXBU
Hamid's other point, that were no calls to abolish the electoral college until 2016 is also wrong. In 1970, the House overwhelmingly passed a constitutional amendment to abolish the EC. Southern senators, many of them segregationists, filibustered the bill.https://www.history.com/news/electoral-college-nearly-abolished-thurmond …
Agree on all counts. That's why we have amendments. It has to be a living document.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
