Murphy's proposal is strangely simple: "Each person in a community agrees to assign status (i.e. distribute their respect) to all the others according to the others' contributions to the community, however each person honestly evaluates the others' contributions."
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
You can start doing this *now*, immediately, wherever you are. Is someone doing something you think is a public service? Praise them or donate to them! Is someone doing something you think is harmful to your community or to humanity? Say so, and withdraw your help!
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Unilaterally choose to, as best you can, make the incentives you send match the things you value. No human incentive system, including the market, can function if people don't *mostly* succeed in doing this.
1 proslijeđeni tweet 8 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
The basic idea of communism is "the workers do all the actual work, and they are being exploited by a tiny number of people who contribute nothing and just leech off them. But if the workers do all the work, they *have all the power.* Why do they tolerate exploitation?"
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
"The workers are *strong*, not weak; if they are systematically exploited it must be because they are confused, lack confidence in their strength, or lack coordination mechanisms. Therefore, raising their awareness and confidence and helping coordinate will solve their problem."
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 7 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I'm not a communist. But my only real disagreement with *this* argument, thus far, is that I think people who do genuine professional, managerial, mercantile, or intellectual work are not parasites but contributors. The "workers" are literally everybody whose work is useful.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
It's easier to *disguise* zero-sum exploitation as positive-sum contribution if you're professional-class -- there's not much doubt that most janitors are really cleaning, while it's more ambiguous whether most bankers are really trading.
1 reply 4 proslijeđena tweeta 30 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Nobody can know infallibly whether somebody is doing positive-sum contribution or zero-sum exploitation. People will have different opinions. This is fine.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Or, at any rate, we have to accept it because it's inevitable. People aren't clones or oracles. Everybody acting on their best judgment (informed by communication with others) is the best humans can possibly do.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I don't necessarily believe that there is a well-defined group called "exploiters", responsible for most social ills, that the majority of people can recognize and can coordinate to keep out.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
Like so-called autism traits, psychopath traits are common in the gen pop. https://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2016/jun/10/the-psychopath-in-you-psychopathic-traits-spectrum … Most ppl are willing to lie or cheat in some situations or contexts; no conscience psychopaths exploit this
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.