If they lose on ROGD, they lose. GI and the SoC are based on the edifice that children know the truth and adults must follow, regardless. If adults can question children, then they can question GI and SoC. The End.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a terrible article. Why would a social worker and an activist be considered relevant in challenging thd findings of biologists and psychologists? The list of citations is intentionally misleading. When you cite an unproven assertion or opinion, that's not science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Her criticism of the cited studies is totally valid, too bad that's lost in a quagmire of conjecture and speculation phrased as conclusion. The only "good science" that you could glean from this article is that this topic really needs more research focus.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"follow the child" if we did that with everyday life, we'd be eating ice cream and candy for every meal. It boils down to wanting to be "friends" with their kids and not actual parents.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The money truck is rolled loaded downhill. Parents will be ignored. I can tell you that the voices of parents are typically ignored about pretty much everything, especially about sexuality and health.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
when has blanchard's typology been disproved "over and over again" as she claims?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.