Yes, she doesn't understand the First Amendment. It protects "hate speech" for a reason. Americans should guard it & not let it be eroded.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @victoriagirl262 @freeradicalfem
And my point is I prefer our First Amendment to the kind of thought/speech policing that is being legislated in your country.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @victoriagirl262 @freeradicalfem
The original post was about the US First Amendment. That's why the response pertained to US, not Canadian law.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @victoriagirl262 @freeradicalfem
Get you're offended, but yr responses to others (not just me) do lack understanding WHY 1st protects ALL speech:the very point of the OP.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The entire purpose of the 1st Amendment was to prevent the State from defining speech or compelling it. That's what the article is about.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Once you allow the State--whoever holds the reins of power in a given historical moment-- to police speech or thought...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
The article was about the US and why it's important to protect the First Amendment from erosion.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.