Obviously, it can't. But when certain traits occur across diverse cultures (some much more sexist than others), implies more than sexism.
-
-
Things that actually have to do with sexual reproduction, sure. Not buying it w/regard to visual rotation which can be learned.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It can be learned. But why the resistance to idea there *might* be a TENDENCY for it to be superior in one sex? What might be the reason?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @DANotLikeYou @FightUnreality and
Which is a ridiculous thing to deduce when talking re: traits that TEND to occur more in one sex, but aren't exclusive to either.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @DANotLikeYou @4th_WaveNow and
And pushing the narrative that women are less capable at "rotating objects in space" (ffs) is self-fulfilling prophecy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FightUnreality @DANotLikeYou and
Not sure anyone is "pushing" anything. Except MRAs/sexist assholes. I don't put honest scientists in same category (many of whom are women).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @DANotLikeYou and
Tell women for millennium that they are incapable of something, deny them ability to develop those skills, & then "scientifically" score 'em
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @FightUnreality @DANotLikeYou and
Sure. But when societies that support women pursuing "typically male" careers show same divergence, why? More importantly--why is that bad?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
And again--population averages say NOTHING about individuals, whatever the findings.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.