Yeah wasn't crazy about that part of the piece. The blackmailing of parents was best bit.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Article's treatment of issue is terrible, but I don't agree w/ your interpretation either. Men didn't have fewer rights than women. Gay men
-
didn't sufficiently use their power over women and live up to patriarchy's ideas of men and women.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes of course. But it's not that "men weren't equal to women." Seems bizarre way to look @ it. Lesbians couldn't marry each other either.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is exactly the trans argument. Gay men were (are) seen as non-manly and "womanly." That does *NOT* = "more oppressed."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No no no. Sexual orientation, NOT sex. You do see you're going down the trans road here right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But it's not because of sex. Gay men aren't oppressed for being men, surely you see that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, and it plays a role in *OPPRESSING WOMEN.* Men who do not oppress women sufficiently are not oppressed because they are men.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Being oppressed for being a non-conforming man =/= being oppressed because you're a man.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And? Does that mean men are more oppressed as women? No Come on You really think that? Gay marriage = men reaching the rights of women? Huh?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.