5. ...persistence. No one is studying whether this might be true. Instead "affirming" clinicians
-
-
6....believe only "true trans" kids will persist after social trans/blockers so no harm done.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
7. This is a textbook example of confirmation bias. They have no proof gender ID is innate, yet
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
8....everything they do is predicated upon this unproven belief. The fact that 100% of blocked
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
9. ...kids proceed to cross-sex hormones they take as proof that their diagnostic skills are
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
10. ...flawless. Instead this should be seen as a huge red flag. Affirming clinicians blinded
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
11...by their own hubris & religious belief that trans ID is innate--even while they promote
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
12....hormones/surgeries for "fluid" & "nonbinary" youth. If gender can be fluid, that means
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
13...gender ID is subject to change, especially in malleable young minds. Why does no journalist
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
14...call them on this glaring contradiction? Hope Jesse will.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
.@KatanaOfLogic @jessesingal @CalHealthline 15. Irreversible med interventions are trivialized. No dysphoria needed for T and top surgery?pic.twitter.com/JBVoXvA7N8
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.