You're not disagreeing. You're telling a lesbian that her understanding/use of a word is "harming"
-
-
You're advocating calling 4 year old children "defiant" because of their personality?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You entirely misunderstood context/use of "defy."When politely disagreed with, you started a battle.pic.twitter.com/DYmYyqV0f5
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow
I started a conversation on something I feel is important. It's sad that disagreement and genuine concern are disregarded as
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ShagMeFrida
@FightUnreality 2. But instead of agreeing to disagree, you chose divisive thought policing. Most importantly,4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @FightUnreality
isn't something you simply agree to disagree on. This is all intended to have consequences, it's why we're all
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You haven't provided a single rational, reasoned explanation for what's wrong w using "defiant."
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It feels like an accusation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You are the one interpreting it as an accusation. No 'mom' is scolding you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Why would you choose to use this term if there is a real possibility it makes them feel this way?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You can't see that this is a descriptor used in analysis not an identity or label *aimed* at a child
-
-
Almost 100% certainty none of the 4 year olds we're referring to as "gender defiant" know about it
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.