This is an incorrect reading of the "methods" section of that study. It explains HOW they located desister subjects.https://twitter.com/rongwrong_/status/758662148348346369 …
-
-
Replying to @4th_WaveNow
@boodleoops So you're saying that Tannehill misread the study and@jessesingal simply accepted her misreading?5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
/2 who did/did not desist. Steensma didn't just *assume* all 80 desisted...pic.twitter.com/Sg9yy5BXmb
1:05 PM - 29 Jul 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.