No. What's an "embarrassment" is the lengths to which intellectually dishonest people with an ax to grind will go--YEARS after an article was published--to deny a voice to the people (trans and detrans) interviewed for that piece.https://twitter.com/themaxburns/status/1378736127658618883 …
-
-
Singal is the scapegoat, but what they really want is to silence any and everyone who didn't benefit from gender transition, or who has questions about it. It's a sort of moral panic, as if allowing detrans & their loved ones a tiny voice causes harm to ppl who DID benefit.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is really grotesque. I wonder if someone is paying Max Burns to do some reputation damage.
-
It's one thing when unhinged activists do it, but another entirely when journalists for major outlets engage in incessant witch hunts. The news profession is terminally ill, infected with a kind of moral righteousness that destroys critical thinking. https://muckrack.com/themaxburns
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.