I've been following this debate for awhile, and based on what I've seen my prediction is that this will elicit some calm, thoughtful discussion touching upon developmental psychology, bioethics, and other areas, with no fiery recriminations whatsoever.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/01/children-who-want-puberty-blockers-must-understand-effects-high-court-rules …
-
-
""Similarly, the meaning of sexual fulfilment, and what the implications of treatment may be for this in the future, will be impossible for many children to comprehend."
-
Yes. This was the argument put forward that was presumably considered a reasonable expectation of understanding of what consent meant here. https://twitter.com/SinclairJM1987/status/1333728812421541889 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nor can they comprehend how important being able to have children together may be to a future partner. There are so many levels of heartache these children may be, innocently, stepping into.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.