To put a finer point on it:
Raise your hand if you were absolutely confident of something at 14 that you now think is totally wrong. Now, what if that something you firmly believed was an irreversible decision (such as permanent infertility)?

-
-
Show this thread
-
And yes, puberty blockers by themselves don't cause permanent infertility, but nearly ALL blocked kids proceed to cross sex hormones (as was noted in the court case), and that combination is what sterilizes.pic.twitter.com/O6mQa1FiIs
Show this thread -
Top gender specialists are well aware of this. Diane Ehrensaft said parents who hesitate to approve such treatments is only balking because they want grandkids (instead of preserving the right of their child to make an informed decision as an adult).https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7kqndq
Show this thread -
Some gender doctors even argue you might as well do SRS on minors, since their gonads have been rendered useless. Like this one at Stanford:https://twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1119978084499894272?s=20 …
Show this thread -
"Affirmative" gender treatment has progressed light years beyond what the Tavistock is doing. US doctors agitate for earlier and earlier treatment. Puberty blockers are the tip of the iceberg. To take just one example:https://twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1159205141842673666?s=20 …
Show this thread -
Mastectomies are not at all uncommon for young teens in the United States. If a UK judge ruled that under-16s can't consent to even (technically reversible) puberty blockers, what about breast removal for a 14-year-old?https://twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1142569134234001409?s=20 …
Show this thread - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.