has several issues, e.g.
a. dress is strongest factor, so counted twice - but is shown to diminish over time
b. parents strongly confirm Gender ID in past and future
c. comparison group is drawn from siblings
c. IATs do not confirm
e. finding also argues for non-transitioning
-
New conversation
-
-
-
A convenience sample like that doesn't really tell you anything that's generalisable. It only tells you about the convenience sample
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s a pretty freaking huge limitation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How is that a study? I loved my GI Joe more than anything ...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Win other words we knew what results we wanted so we ensured we only included families who would give us the results we wanted! This isn’t research, this is propaganda.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's really disturbing is the quote at the end of the article that claims gender is more nature than nurture. The trans movement needs people to think that gender identity is innate. So much for gender being a social construct.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.