How do you see the Reimer case as having relevance? I am not saying it doesn't but am curious how you would link it to the current discourse on gender dysphoria? We actually published another case of ablatio penis (Bradley et al., 1998), which, at least at the time that... /1https://twitter.com/Craftonia/status/1199440639554936832 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @ZUCKERKJ
The Reimer case has been widely used as ‘proof’ that second wave feminists were wrong to emphasise social construction of identity and that ‘gender identity’ is innate. Of course the Reimer case proves no such thing.
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
If the Reimer case proves anything, it's that biological sex is innate, not "gender identity."
11:58 AM - 27 Nov 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
12 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.