No, it's that the phenomenon isn't ROGD, it's *parental perception* of ROGD
-
-
You are applying your own bias of what you think ROGD means here. ROGD is meant to differentiate between 2 populations. Those getting GD pre-puberty and those who have seemingly no history of pre-puberty GD and manifesting post puberty.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Were the subjects of the study the kids or their parents?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It’s parents perceptions of this ... could some have missed markers of trans in their kids early years ? Sure. ALL of them though ? Beggars belief. ROGD was never been observed 15 years ago. It seems an entirely new phenomena
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Kids hide things well when they think their parents won't accept them. I know grown ass people who are on hrt whos family still don't know. It's something that is ignored, dismissed or not noticed for many reasons. I had to come out as bi 3 times before my mom realized I was bi.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
They are trying to shed light on this — if some trans ID’d kids are caused by social contagion. Not ALL. SOME. If true, The kids claims here are less valid than the parents actually. Would an aneorixic kid deny an eating disorder ? Yes probably. Doesn’t make it bad science.
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @A_Sane_Skeptic @Jonatan_TheDick and
Brian, thank you for your reasoned voice on this. You may find this interesting, by
@PsychRabble . The hysteria around Littman's study, and the concerted effort to discredit it (when she herself called for more study on the matter) is so unnecessary.https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/201903/rapid-onset-gender-dysphoria …3 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @A_Sane_Skeptic and
Do you think my video was "hysteria"?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sjwdebates @A_Sane_Skeptic and
Yes & no. Even yr promoting tweet claims Littman's aim was "stoke fear in the public" & the vid descriptor says "hurts trans kids." You accuse her of "scientific illiteracy." None of that is accurate. You assume bad faith in an initial descriptive effort, as
@A_Sane_Skeptic said.2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @sjwdebates and
You (think it was you) also tweeted that she deliberately left out survey responses from parents who DIDN'T observe rapid onset, but the study was specifically ABOUT that population. It wasn't meant to be a comparison study with other gender dysphoria presentations.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And I'm just going to post this again for good measure. It's reasonable, seems to address the fears some have about the study, while also explaining why the pile-on to Littman's work has mostly been misguided--and harmful to scientific inquiry.https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rouser/201903/rapid-onset-gender-dysphoria …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.