Thread:
The #JamesYounger reporting could use some nuance. The jury’s verdict is disturbing, but the child isn’t being “chemically castrated”—YET. Nor is a “boy in a dress” the real issue here. If you aren’t already in the Gender War trenches, you may not be aware that:
-
Show this thread
-
1. Social transition (what James’ mom & her “affirmative” allies promote) is not the same as simply allowing a child to choose haircuts, clothing, or toys. Social transition = everyone around the child endorses that the child is “really” the opposite sex and/or in the wrong body.
5 replies 27 retweets 146 likesShow this thread -
4thWaveNow Retweeted 4thWaveNow
2. With full social transition, everyone is told they MUST use opp-sex pronouns, new name, & avoid mentioning (or validating) the child's bio sex. Some parents have even changed the birth certificate of their very young children.https://twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/1164750791380365314 …
4thWaveNow added,
1 reply 20 retweets 90 likesShow this thread -
3. Social transition leads in most cases to medical transition later. Technically, it’s reversible, but how likely is a small child to reverse course when all adults (teachers, doctors, parents) the child relies on for a reality check agree s/he is opposite sex from toddlerhood?
3 replies 23 retweets 140 likesShow this thread -
4. The
#JamesYounger court filings mention he will be reassessed near puberty & may then go on puberty blockers. Blockers alone do not permanently sterilize (see: kids diagnosed w/precocious puberty and on blockers temporarily were not sterilized), BUT6 replies 8 retweets 82 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
6. Whatever the fitness of the Younger parents, NONE OF THIS would be happening w/out the pediatric transition industry which has taken hold in the US. It's the gender specialists who allow this, powered by the rocket fuel of extremist activists & a prostrate mainstream media.
5 replies 21 retweets 158 likesShow this thread -
7. Whatever the fitness of either parent, question is: Should a court of law force the affirmative model of “care” on a child and/or adults responsible for caring for/educating him? Should a US court of law compel the speech of a parent, teacher or others involved in James’ care?
10 replies 20 retweets 135 likesShow this thread
4thWaveNow Retweeted 4thWaveNow
4thWaveNow added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.