Thread:
The #JamesYounger reporting could use some nuance. The jury’s verdict is disturbing, but the child isn’t being “chemically castrated”—YET. Nor is a “boy in a dress” the real issue here. If you aren’t already in the Gender War trenches, you may not be aware that:
-
-
4. The
#JamesYounger court filings mention he will be reassessed near puberty & may then go on puberty blockers. Blockers alone do not permanently sterilize (see: kids diagnosed w/precocious puberty and on blockers temporarily were not sterilized), BUTShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
6. Whatever the fitness of the Younger parents, NONE OF THIS would be happening w/out the pediatric transition industry which has taken hold in the US. It's the gender specialists who allow this, powered by the rocket fuel of extremist activists & a prostrate mainstream media.
Show this thread -
7. Whatever the fitness of either parent, question is: Should a court of law force the affirmative model of “care” on a child and/or adults responsible for caring for/educating him? Should a US court of law compel the speech of a parent, teacher or others involved in James’ care?
Show this thread - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And no evidence of "reversibility" b/c past use of PBs to stop EARLY puberty to be re-initiated at the NORMAL time tell us little about what happens when NORMAL puberty is stopped and reinitiated at a LATE stage. Will the bones, brain catch up? Or is a critical window missed?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because "David Reimer" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.