Thread:
The #JamesYounger reporting could use some nuance. The jury’s verdict is disturbing, but the child isn’t being “chemically castrated”—YET. Nor is a “boy in a dress” the real issue here. If you aren’t already in the Gender War trenches, you may not be aware that:
-
-
3. Social transition leads in most cases to medical transition later. Technically, it’s reversible, but how likely is a small child to reverse course when all adults (teachers, doctors, parents) the child relies on for a reality check agree s/he is opposite sex from toddlerhood?
Show this thread -
4. The
#JamesYounger court filings mention he will be reassessed near puberty & may then go on puberty blockers. Blockers alone do not permanently sterilize (see: kids diagnosed w/precocious puberty and on blockers temporarily were not sterilized), BUTShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
6. Whatever the fitness of the Younger parents, NONE OF THIS would be happening w/out the pediatric transition industry which has taken hold in the US. It's the gender specialists who allow this, powered by the rocket fuel of extremist activists & a prostrate mainstream media.
Show this thread -
7. Whatever the fitness of either parent, question is: Should a court of law force the affirmative model of “care” on a child and/or adults responsible for caring for/educating him? Should a US court of law compel the speech of a parent, teacher or others involved in James’ care?
Show this thread - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.