The crux of the disagreement is whether--given this very real betrayal by the left--the answer is to join w/ the right. Setting aside everything else, cleaving to orgs like Family Policy & Heritage further the (wrong) impression that only the far right cares about the issue.
Of course not! But this isn't about Emily. It's about what one commenter said in this thread: Many people will take one look at the document & toss it when they see the orgs endorsing it. While you may dismiss that concern, not everyone does--*because of their history*.
-
-
Really, the ppl you most need to convince of your approach are those wary detransitioners who've made it quite clear they won't trust these orgs. They are the people who've been harmed and have standing to say so (including in a court of law).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Then documents which talk about the harms of the affirmative approach must do more than a one-sentence mention of the harms to LG youth. If you want to build trust with the very important population of detransitioned lesbians, this stuff matters (speaking as the mother of one).
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.