Beautifully put response from a gay men about why our ethical principles require us to add P to GLBT.https://twitter.com/Techruptor/status/1172941949147525121 …
-
-
I'm asking this question in good faith. I do not believe Dr. Cantor is in favor of child sexual abuse (as he has stated multiple times), and that he draws a clear distinction between offending/non-offending "no contact" pedophiles, based on his own area of research.
-
I think Pedophilia is often mixed up with Ephebophilia. But there isn't much data, if any, to substantiate if Ephebophilia is measured accurately. Classic cases of teens with adults is the "newest sex offender" registry rhetoric scare tactic. But pedophile is often used instead.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As a follow-on question, if "nomaps" want to convince the public they should not be vilified, why can't they simply form their own organizations/movements? That's what women did--and gay people, disability activists, and African Americans, to name a few.
-
They have formed their own movement, partially on Twitter. But many of your own supporters try repeatedly to get them banned.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh. They didn’t mean pansexuals then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this for me? It is exactly being "not plain vanilla" that we have in common. HIV killed primarily the G's, but L's are still in the group. The I's have nothing to do with sex orientation at all, but they are still in the group. (And groups for chronic illness do indeed exist.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.