"This is significant considering men who have sex with men (MSM) are still considered to be a high-risk donor group." Clearly, this is the result of lobbying by trans activists. Because their "gender identity" trumps the safety of our blood supply...https://medium.com/@LaraAdamsMiller/the-american-red-cross-uses-gender-identity-not-birth-sex-to-determine-blood-donor-eligibility-ca809c3b2512 …
-
-
Maybe none of this should be surprising. Was reminded of this thread from last year, featuring trans ppl outraged by doctors who had the temerity to want to know their biological sex...for medical reasons.https://twitter.com/4th_WaveNow/status/948616743316058112 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- End of conversation
-
-
-
statistically significant is not the same as clinically significant
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.