So serious question for the Brits: If your spouse started tweeting at you with "persistent" messages that caused you "annoyance, inconvenience, or needless anxiety" couldn't they also be arrested and charged? Doubt there's anything in UK law that would prevent that, eh? hmmmmm. https://twitter.com/thehomoarchy/status/1168392636073267200 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Replying to @4th_WaveNow
Serious answer: in UK, as well as USA, there are badly thought out or irrelevant laws & regulations which get broken all the time. The trangressions are generally ignored as they rarely cause actual harm. They are not ignored when it suits the powers-that-be to pursue someone.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PrideinScience
Ok. But the First Amendment protects us from absurdities like being led away in handcuffs for something you said on Twitter that "annoyed" someone.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow
"Harassment, under the laws of the United States, is defined as any repeated or continuing uninvited contact that serves no useful purpose beyond creating alarm, annoyance, or emotional distress" https://definitions.uslegal.com/h/harassment/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PrideinScience
Right--but can you name a single case of someone being arrested in the US for the sorts of Twitter "transgressions" we see quite often in the UK? Our free speech protections are broad and the bar is higher.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow
It doesn't matter whether I can name a case - it is written into your law: "annoyance", same as ours. The 1st doesn't nullify that, but I don't even think that is the real difference. It is that in the UK, people as a whole are not as lawyered up and litigious as you lot 1/2
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PrideinScience
You seriously underestimate how much the First Amendment protects us. You should read up on that. If we didn't have it, you're right--our jails would be overflowing with wrongthinkers because of how litigious we are. But on free speech, we're way better off here.
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow
You should have waited for 2/2 until answering 1/2 I don't think your jails would be overflowing with wrongthinkers at all. Just the opposite. My point is there are other things going on here apart from a lack of a 1st amd.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PrideinScience
4thWaveNow Retweeted
Oh, it's just as bad here; if anything, extremist trans ideology is MORE entrenched. But something like this sounds like parody to us in the US. It WOULD NOT HAPPEN, and it is down to our free speech protections. https://twitter.com/HarryTheOwl/status/1110503946915733505 …
4thWaveNow added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Let's be crystal clear: Law enforcement in the US would refuse to engage in this kind of situation. The police. But anyone can file a lawsuit over anything (even if frivolous).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.