Why are no liberal (or just politically neutral!) law firms being hired for cases defending women's/girls sports? Current case in Connecticut is represented by ADF (Alliance Defending Freedom). Can someone explain why only ADF is taking these cases?
-
-
Bc T rights are seen as a natural extension of LGB rights, as a progressive stance. The 'liberal' position in the US is unthinkingly pro-trans rights; hopefully, more people can understand and oppose.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Staff attorneys are expensive and someone needs to subsidize them. US conservatives founded and fund ADF as a counterpart to the "liberal" ACLU, so they draw from a wide range of donors. They choose cases which please their donors and encourage more: sex-based essentialism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.