Why would attaching great importance to the importance of child rearing lead to denial of sex-based differences?
Is anyone actually proposing that, on AVERAGE, a female homo sapiens (a mammal, as in derived from "mammary") wouldn't have an innate tendency to nurture--especially since human infants are totally helpless at birth (due to large cranium)? As always, notice AVERAGE caveat above
-
-
I'm wondering what that means in terms of modern behaviour. As in, does it mean women choose to stay at home or get childcare. Why is this a strange question?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Mammalian females invest heavily in their young. Without being wired to do so, the young would be abandoned/killed/etc. Of course, before you cut my head off: Outliers on the bell curve won't have such wiring, and/or life experiences (aka "socialization") affect how one nurtures.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.