Important to point out, again, that these are TENDENCIES (as you said) and averages. Too many people misunderstand that point. Outliers on the "tail" of a bell curve are no less women, no less men...
I used to think that until I saw the cross-cultural study showing women and men in the most gender-equal societies (notably Scandinavia) freely choose people vs thing jobs in even greater proportions.
-
-
who wouldn't rather work with people?
-
Lots of men.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
53 nations. The real issue is the devaluation ($ and otherwise) of "people jobs." Why do we reify traditional male pursuits & consider women's choices (on average, i.e., NOT EVERYONE) for more people-oriented work to be somehow inferior? Think about it.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23179757_Sex_Differences_in_Personality_Traits_and_Gender-Related_Occupational_Preferences_across_53_Nations_Testing_Evolutionary_and_Social-Environmental_Theories …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Honest question: Why would humans, of all species, only be subject to social pressures, while our closest animal relatives (bonobos/chimps) and other animals without "culture" show such strong sex differences?
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.