The @nytimes is doing penance. They dared to publish a balanced piece on breast binding. The terrifying headline was, of course, obligatory--likely demanded by the Trans Thought Police on their editorial staff.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/17/reader-center/chest-binding.html …
-
-
ICYMI here's the article
@nytimes is doing penance for--by any measure, balanced vis-a-vis the pros and cons of the practice of breast binding. (As with any attempt at a balanced article, there was a totally predictable trans-activist freakout over this.)https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/31/well/transgender-teens-binders.html?module=inline …Show this thread -
"It's binding or suicide". How can
@nytimes editors think this is a good headline to run? Contravenes all standards of ethical journalism, clearly laid out by@CDCgov and@samaritans . But "ethical journalism" is becoming more and more an oxymoron.pic.twitter.com/cWo2n4Escx
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seems
@nytimes also deliberately &conveniently neglected to include any of the many tween/teen girls who are encouraged by adults to bind their breasts. NYT surely realizes plenty of vulnerable kids are reading their pro-binding article & will be lured into this harmful practice.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.