2. There was also a recent interview for a liberal outlet--reporter actively pursued us and said story would be out within the week--also pulled. Reporters are always polite but vague about reason for non-publication, then stop responding to emails.
-
-
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @GabeBlessing and
3. Conversely, 4thWaveNow has been mentioned and linked dozens of times by conservative outlets. We have not given interviews to those outlets for the reasons you mentioned above. The effect of this censorship-by-omission in the MSM and left press is twofold:
1 reply 7 retweets 43 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @GabeBlessing and
4. Few people know 4thWaveNow exists, even though we were the first (and still one of the few) US sites/citizen media to discuss problems w/pediatric/youth transition, with rigorous fact-checking & insistence on reliable sourcing. We also publish articles by detran-desisters,
1 reply 9 retweets 44 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @GabeBlessing and
5. ...clinicians, in addition to investigative pieces on high-profile gender doctors and therapists. Some conservative outlets have picked up our work and we don't have a problem with that EXCEPT this:
1 reply 4 retweets 37 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @GabeBlessing and
6. Since the general public has no idea a group of liberal parents have been covering the excesses of trans activism as it pertains to youth (because the MSM *deliberately* refuses to acknowledge our existence), a false impression is created:
1 reply 15 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @GabeBlessing and
7. Only rightwing, anti-gay conservatives are raising the alarm about things like 13-yr-old mastectomies or 8-yr-olds on cross sex hormones. It's hard not to see this censorship-by-omission by the liberal and mainstream press as deliberately trying to create that false impression
1 reply 16 retweets 61 likes -
Replying to @4th_WaveNow @GabeBlessing and
8. The MSM-liberal reporters we've spoken to KNOW we aren't right-wing conservatives. They've seen our website and Twitter feed, which since inception have been strongly supportive of gay/lesbian people and have never touted conservative views. They know this very well. So...
1 reply 12 retweets 54 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @briejnm @GabeBlessing and
Yes--that's the one (who for the moment shall remain nameless--for the moment) who ALSO accused the three 4thWaveNow members she interviewed of colluding *with each other* (she didn't say on what). Did she think we never talked to each other or had nothing in common?
0 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
She was clearly working on a hit piece against us. But @nytimes wouldn't even publish that! Can only guess (as stated in this thread) they don't want readers to know 4th exists--danger is people will *think for themselves* after they see our website/Twitter feed. Can't have that!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.